Legal Opinion

Arciniega v. Freeman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 26, 1971No. 70-5135PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner’s parole was revoked by the Federal Parole Board because of association with other ex-convicts. In a petition for habeas corpus, petitioner contended that the record did not disclose any evidence in support of this conclusion. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit sustained the revocation on the sole ground that petitioner worked at a restaurant-nightclub that employed other ex-convicts. 439 F. 2d 776.

The Parole Board has wide authority to set conditions, 18 U. S. C. § 4203 (a), and here petitioner was forbidden to “associate” with other ex-convicts. But the Board’s own…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Raymond Arciniega v. Edward R. Freeman, U. S. MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  3. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. United States v. Ray Donald LoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Ronald Scott PaulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API