Legal Opinion
Douglas Plumley v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1992No. 92-15050Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
979 F.2d 855
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Douglas PLUMLEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 92-15050.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 4, 1992.*
Decided Nov. 18, 1992.
Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM**
2
Douglas Plumley, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. Gary L. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Arciniega v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- James W. McQuerry v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Lewis L. Boniface v. P.M. Carlson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Raymond Arciniega v. Edward R. Freeman, U. S. MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971