Legal Opinion
Hawksbill Sea Turtle v. Federal Emergency Management Agency
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided September 26, 1996No. Civil Action No. 96-114PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROTMAN, Judge, Sitting by Designation
OPINION
Presently before the court is plaintiffs' Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Having con sidered plaintiff's application and supporting documents, defendant's opposition papers, and all other motions and documents submitted by the parties, having held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction, and for the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the request for preliminary relief.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is the second of two occasions on which plaintiffs seek to prevent defendants from erecting a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hawksbill Sea Turtle v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Hawksbill Sea Turtle v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1998
- Hawksbill Sea Turtle v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Hawksbill Sea Turtle v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Hawksbill Sea Turtle v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997