Legal Opinion
I.M.A.G.E. v. Bailar
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 28, 1978No. C-76-1979 ACWPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS CERTAIN DEFENDANTS AND CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CLASS ALLEGATIONS IN PART; AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF CLASS ACTION IN PART
WOLLENBERG, District Judge.
Class action allegations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., have been made concerning the San Francisco District1 of the United States *552Postal Service (Postal Service) for discrimination in employment against Hispanics and women. This action is brought by two individual plaintiffs, Maria Hansen and Janie…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Duncan v. TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1979
- Quillen v. U.S. Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
- DiMaggio v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Hutcheson v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985
- Dean v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.