State Highway Department v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, Judge.
The questions raised by the motion to strike and the motion to dismiss may be disposed of together, for the fundamental question here is whether it is necessary, as a condition precedent to the appeal (rather than at some later date, or not at all) that the amount of the assessors’ award must be paid or tendered to the condemnee, and this question necessarily depends upon the consideration of Supreme Court cases, and especially the latest case, Woodside v. City of Atlanta, 214 Ga. 75 (103 S. E. 2d 108). In that case the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the trial court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Woodside v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Rivers v. Cole CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Oliver v. Union Point & White Plains RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Gate City Terminal Co. v. ThrowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Hurt v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Fidelity-Phenix Insurance v. MauldinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- State Highway Department v. HendrixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- DeKalb County v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Gulf Life Insurance Co. v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Davis v. PaulkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.