Legal Opinion

Sager v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 1984No. A8010-05790; CA A26166PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

In this negligence action, plaintiff assigns as error a trial court order denying her motion to strike defendant City of Portland’s (City) discretionary immunity affirmative defense and the granting of a directed verdict in favor of the City. The City cross-appeals. It contends that the trial court erred in dismissing its cross-claim against defendants Wilkinson. Defendants Wilkinson also cross-appeal. They contend that the trial court erred in dismissing their cross-claim against the City.

Plaintiff was injured when she tripped and fell on a defective sidewalk. She brought this action against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Stevenson v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Noonan v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Weaver v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. Daugherty v. Oregon State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ralph E. Thornton Cheryl A. Thornton v. City of St. Helens Warren Baker Brian LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Ramirez v. Hawaii T & S Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Vokoun v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Hutcheson v. City of KeizerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Jones-Clark v. SevereCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API