Legal Opinion

Hutcheson v. City of Keizer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 2000No. 97C-10988; CA A102696PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant, City of Keizer (the City), appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs, homeowners, on a negligence action arising out of the flooding of the Country Glen Estates subdivision in 1996. The City contends, inter alia, that it was immune from liability pursuant to the discretionary function immunity provision of the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA), ORS 30.265, and that the court erred in giving a “less satisfactory evidence” instruction. Plaintiffs cross-appeal, asserting that the court improperly applied the OTCA in limiting their recovery. On appeal we conclude that, although the trial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. Hawaii T & S Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. EgelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Stiles v. Freemotion, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Mann v. McCulloughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API