Legal Opinion
Jones-Clark v. Severe
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 17, 1993No. C880945CV; CA A63850PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
In this negligence action, the trial court granted defendants a summary judgment, ORCP 47C, on the ground that they are entitled to immunity. ORS 30.265(3)(c).1 We affirm.2
As the moving parties, defendants must show that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We view the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff. ORCP 47C; Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695, 699, 588 P2d 1100 (1978).
The summary judgment record indicates that in February, 1988, Donn Schuch was sentenced to five years probation stemming from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Lowrimore v. DimmittOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Little v. WimmerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Miller v. Grants Pass Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Bradford v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lathrope-Olson v. Oregon Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Harmon v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Bakr v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Leithead v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Leithead v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997