Tolliver v. Mathas
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Chief Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
In our opinion dated August 24, 1987, 512 N.E.2d 187 (1987), the majority concluded that contracts between Acutus and Mathas violated a bankruptcy statute and that the contracts were, therefore, void and violative of public policy. Mathas filed a petition for rehearing which we now grant.
FACTS
In 1978, Marte Mathas and three (8) other individuals formed a corporation known as T and M Fabricating, Inc. (T and M) which provided welding services to the steel industry. Mathas managed T and M's daily operations and owned one third (%) of the outstanding…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Burger Man, Inc. v. Jordan Paper Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Central Beverage Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Goeke v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Fresh Cut, Inc. v. FazliIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Horseshoe Hammond, LLC v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2007
- Sinn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Babyback's International, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Stampco Const. Co., Inc. v. GuffeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.