Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Snyder

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1889No. 13,475PublishedCited by 34 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit. Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellee was. a passenger on one of the appellant’s trains, which, by the falling of a bridge, was precipitated into White River, and the appellee severely injured.

Dr. Bowles, an expert witness called by the appellant, gave an opinion as to the nature and extent of the injury sustained by the appellee, and on cross-examination it was developed that his testimony was in part based on statements made to him by the appellee.

*436Waiving all questions of practice, and deciding the appellant’s motion to strike out, as if it were properly restricted to the alleged incompetent part of the.testimony,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Denver & Rio Grande Railway v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Union Traction Co. v. BerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. MalletteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Holloway v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  5. Brunker v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API