Legal Opinion

Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 16, 2013No. 12-729PublishedCited by 354 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

*102 A participant in an employee benefit plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 88 Stat. 829 , as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., may bring a civil action under § 502(a)(1)(B) to recover benefits due under the terms of the plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (a)(1) (B). Courts have generally required participants to exhaust the plan's administrative remedies before filing suit to recover benefits. ERISA does not, however, specify a statute of limitations for filing suit under § 502(a) (1)(B). Filling that gap, the plan at issue here requires participants to bring suit…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by354 opinions

  1. Lozano v. Montoya AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. CTS Corp. v. WaldburgerSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. M&G Polymers United States, LLC v. TackettSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Innova Hospital San Antonio, L.P. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
  5. Michael Faciane v. Sun Life Asuc Co. of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

349 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API