Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Holly Bra of California, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1969No. 22543PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner, under section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(e), seeks enforcement of its order against respondent Holly Bra of California, Inc., a manufacturer of swim wear and women’s undergarments. (NLRB v. Holly Bra of California, Inc., 164 NLRB No. 151.)
The Board, on review of the trial examiner’s findings, found no prejudicial error, and affirmed his ruling that respondent had committed unfair labor practices violative of sections 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act and had engaged in misconduct affecting the results of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- W. C. Nabors, D/B/A W. C. Nabors Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. Elias Brothers Big Boy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Packers, Inc., Frosty Morn DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Thomas J. McGowan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. Haberman Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Kaynard v. Palby Lingerie, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Ford v. AlfaroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Rivcom Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.