Legal Opinion

Maeder Steel Products Co. v. Brewster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1929No. 21558. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

The work covered by a contract between J. M. Brewster and the state for clearing, grading and construction of a certain state road was completed in September, 1926, and accepted by the state. The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York was the surety upon the contractor’s bond to the state. Brewster entered into several subcontracts, one of which was with B. Gr. Henley, for the construction of a portion of the road. A copy of the subcontract with Henley was filed with the state resident engineer, who notified the district engineer of such filing. A copy of the subcontract was not, however,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cascade Construction Co. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Rachow v. Philbrick & NicholsonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Nemah River Towboat Co. v. BrewsterWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Austin v. C. v. Wilder & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hamilton v. WhittakerWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Union Oil Co. v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. W. P. Simpson Co. v. Crompton-Richmond Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API