Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Whittaker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1947No. Nos. 30272, 30273PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether, under the statutes governing public contracts, a charge for freight, or the cost of transportation of equipment used by a contractor in the performance of his contract, is an enforcible claim against the retained percentage, or against the bond filed by the contractor?

The two cases presenting the question were consolidated for trial and will be so considered on this appeal.

The trial court found that the charges were not lienable and entered judgment accordingly.

Appellants’ assignment of error challenges the correctness of the judgment of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kansas City ex rel. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. YoumansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. United States Rubber Co. of California v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Standard Boiler Works v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Rachow v. Philbrick & NicholsonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Western Clinic & Hospital Ass'n v. Gabriel Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. County of Spokane v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API