Legal Opinion
Austin v. C. v. Wilder & Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1965No. 37010PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
May 28, 1959, defendant (appellant) Wilder & Co. contracted to construct a sanitary sewer project for the City of Bellingham.
The contract provided:
“The said Contractor [Wilder & Co.] agrees to pay the wages of all persons and for assistance of every kind em ployed upon or about said work, and for all materials purchased therefor, and the City of Bellingham may withhold any and all payments under the contract until satisfied that such wages, assistance and materials have been fully paid for.”
The contract also provided that:. . The Contractor [Wilder & Co.] shall not assign or transfer the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Ledingham v. City of BlaineWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Cascade Construction Co. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Rachow v. Philbrick & NicholsonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Crane Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- LRS Electric Controls, Inc. v. Hamre Construction Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- LRS Electric Controls, Inc. v. Hamre Const., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Better Financial Solutions, Inc. v. Transtech Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Better Financial Solutions, Inc. v. Transtech Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- National Concrete Cutting, Inc. v. Northwest GM Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.