Legal Opinion

Nemah River Towboat Co. v. Brewster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1929No. 21591. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This action was originally brought by parties not now before this court, seeking recovery on their demands against the appellants here. Respondent, by answer and cross-complaint, set up a cause of action against the appellants, alleging that appellant Brewster was under contract with the state to build a certain state road; that the casualty company was surety on his bond; that respondent, at the instance of Brewster, had performed certain work and labor in towing gravel and lumber to be used in the performance of the contract; and that respondent had filed its claim therefor in the manner…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
  3. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. Puget Sound Engine WorksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
  4. Taylor v. ConnettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
  5. United States ex rel. Sabine & E. T. Ry. Co. v. HyattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. Chef-Reddy Foods Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  2. Shope Enterprises, Inc. v. Kent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Airefco, Inc. v. Yelm Community Schools No. 2Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Maeder Steel Products Co. v. BrewsterWashington Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API