Legal Opinion

Knauth v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1912No. 821PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract-27089 (T. D. 32006).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Yries, Judge

This appeal concerns what is admitted to be printed paper advertising cards, with the outline of a picture die cut into them after the manner of a stencil. They were classified for dutiable purposes under the proviso to paragraph 415 of the tariff act of August 5,1909, which reads as follows:

Provided, That paper embossed, or cut, die-cut, or stamped into designs or shapes, such as initials, monograms, lace, borders, bands, strips, or other forms, or cut or shaped for boxes, plain or printed but not lithographed, and not specially provided for in this section, shall be dutiable at thirty-five…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. FuldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. WymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Protest 928980-G of FriedbergUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  4. Freund Mayer & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  5. Freund Mayer & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API