Walker v. City of Jacksonville
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BUFORD, C. J.:
This cause is before, us on appeal and motion to dismiss, . timely made, on the ground that appellant has failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Sec. 59.09 Fla. Stats. 1941, (same F.S.A.) requiring the payment of costs in the lower court before a plaintiff may invoke the right of review in the Supreme Court.
We have repeatedly recognized the force and effect of the statute and applied its provisions on motion to dismiss, although we have intimated that it might be oppressive and, in our view, lacking in broad justice. See Union Bank of Florida, etc. v. McBride, 2 Fla.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gordon v. CampSupreme Court of Florida · 1848
- Callison v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Busch Ex Rel. South Florida Farms Co. v. GoodnoSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Akins v. BetheaSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
- Funke v. Federal Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Hale v. MartinSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Ogier v. John H. Swisher & Sons, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Spector v. AhrenholzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958