Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Furlong

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. The legal issue raised has been rendered academic by amendment of the regulation to require' proof of intent to consume (cf., People v Lee, 58 NY2d 491).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Harkavy v. ConsilvioNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. People v. WestNew Paltz Justice Court · 2004
  3. People v. BuckleyNew York District Court · 1989
  4. People v. VillatoroJustice Court of Village of Westbury · 1993
  5. People v. KirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API