Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Burnham

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 30, 1977No. 2384-2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

The sole issue on appeal is whether a divorce decree's award to a wife of certain real property "together with the residence situated thereon as well as any obligation owing against said property" constitutes an "acknowledgment" or creates a new promise to pay, thus removing the bar of the statute of limitations to enforcement of the original promise. We hold the language creates neither an acknowledgment nor a sufficient promise to pay and affirm the trial court's order dismissing plaintiffs' action.

On August 15, 1968, Stanton Burnham and his wife, Norma, executed a demand promissory note…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zioncheck v. HepdenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Addison v. StaffordWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Boyer v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. B-OK, Inc. v. StoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Byrnes v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fetty v. WengerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Fetty v. WengerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Wellington v. WellingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. Wellington v. WellingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API