Wellington v. Wellington
Court of Appeals of Washington
1ConcurrenceCallow, J.
(concurring in the result)—I concur in the result.
An acknowledgment in writing by the debtor of the existence of a valid debt extends the running of the statutory period during which payment of the debt may be enforced. Strong v. Sunset Copper Co., 9 Wn.2d 214, 114 P.2d 526, 135 A.L.R. 423 (1941); Burnham v. Burnham, 18 Wn. App. 1, 567 P.2d 242 (1977). The running of the statute of limitations does not wipe out a debt, but simply bars enforcement of the remedy for the recovery of the debt. Lombardo v. Mottola, 18 Wn. App. 227, 566 P.2d 1273 (1977). Courts endeavor to avoid extinguishing valid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. KuhlenschmidtIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Strong v. Sunset Copper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Matanuska Valley Lines, Inc., a Corporation of the Territory of Alaska v. Frank H. MolitorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Lombardo v. MottolaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Burnham v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977