Legal Opinion

Grigsby & Co. v. Bratton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 54 opinions

PROM WILSON. Appeal from Circuit Court of Wilson County to the Court of Civil Appeals and by ■ certiorari from the Court of Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court. — Jno. E. Richardson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

This cause was tried by the circuit judge, without the intervention of a jury, and his findings of fact were reduced to writing pursuant to the request of defendant below, Thomas Grigsby, who, as sole owner, conducted a drug store in Lebanon under the name style of Grigsby & Co.

From this finding it appears that plaintiff’s (Brat-ton’s) automobile was by his direction taken by his son, Clyde Bratton, aged about seventeen years, to the defendant’s drug store to be replenished with gasoline. The machine was driven to a point in the street in front of the store at or about dark. Young Bratton…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seith v. Commonwealth Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. RoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Rosenbaum v. ShoffnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Kroger Company v. GiemTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Figuers v. FlyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Todd v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Pierce v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1955
  5. Power Packing Co. v. BorumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API