Legal Opinion

Kroger Company v. Giem

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1964PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court in approving the verdict of the jury which found all issues against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendants. We granted certiorari and the case has been argued at the bar of this Court.

The Kroger Company commenced an action for un-liquidated damages against the defendants, wherein it sought to recover upon two theories, one sounding in tort and the other in contract, upon the following state of facts:

The Kroger Company (Kroger) let a written contract to Seth Giem and Associates, of Memphis (Giem) for certain additions and remodeling to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Spivey v. St. Thomas HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  3. Ford Motor v. WagonerTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Moody v. Gufl Refining Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Osborn v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. McClenahan v. CooleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wyatt v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  3. White v. Methodist Hospital SouthCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Roberts v. Robertson County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  5. Emery Waterhouse Co. v. LeaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API