Legal Opinion

Rosenbaum v. Shoffner

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1897PublishedCited by 31 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This is an action for damages for - the death of the plaintiff’s husband.- There was trial before the Court and jury, and a verdict and judgment for $10,000, and the defendant has appealed, and assigned errors. The facts, so far as material, are that the plaintiff’s husband, Daniel P. Shoffner, went into the storehouse of the defendant, Rosenbaum, on Main Street, in the city of Memphis, for the purpose of making some purchases, and was examining a base burner stove, and talking about its cost with a salesman or clerk. He was estimating the quantity of pipe that would be required to set it up,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Brosnan v. SweetserIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hendricken v. MeadowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rollestone v. Cassirer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Robinson v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. J. G. Christopher Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  4. Gargaro v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  5. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co. v. CampagnaTennessee Supreme Court · 1922

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API