Legal Opinion
James Mattis v. David Massman and General Motors Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 6, 2004No. 02-1301PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Chief Judge.
Defendants David Massman and General Motors Corporation (“GM”) appeal from the district court’s order granting Plaintiff James Mattis’s motion to remand and amend his complaint-. Mattis had initially raised four separate state-law claims in his complaint filed in the Michigan state court. GM subsequently removed the case to federal court on the grounds that all Mattis’s claims were preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. In the district court, Mattis moved to amend his complaint and eliminate two of his four claims. He argued that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Benjamin Craig Long v. Bando Manufacturing of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Anita Loyd v. Saint Joseph Mercy OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Thomas M. Klepsky v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Paul v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Hahn v. RauchDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Valinski v. Detroit EdisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.