Legal Opinion

Electrical Reactance Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1951No. Appeals, Nos. 12 and 13PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

In these two cases the employer appeals from awards of compensation. Appellant contends that claimants’ unemployment was “due to voluntarily leaving work without good cause,” and that under §402 (b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law as amended, 43 PS §802, they thus became ineligible for relief.

The claimants, who were the principal employes in appellant’s payroll department, left their employment on October 10, 1949, after a dispute with their supervisor. The supervisor was heard to complain unjustly that her health had been affected through her having had to perform the work of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Kaylock Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Uniweld Products, Inc. v. INDUSTRIAL REL. COM'N, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Wallace v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Citizens Bank of Shelbyville v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Porco v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API