Legal Opinion
Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 16, 2007No. 04 C 5312, 05 C 1079, 05 C 4088, 05 C 4120, 05 C 4811, 05 C 5164PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES B. MORAN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Trading Technologies International, Inc. (“TT”) brought suit against eS-peed, Inc., ITSEcco Holdings Limited, Ecco LLC, and EccoWare Ltd. (collectively “eSpeed”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,766,304 ('304) and 6,882,132 ('132). Both parties have filed a number of summary judgment motions in an attempt to limit the scope of the trial. Today we deal with the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment with respect to eSpeed’s invalidity defense of pri- or public use. Connected to the motions…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Corteva Agriscience LLC, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Agrigenetics, Inc. v. Inari Agriculture, Inc., Inari Agriculture NVDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
- Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008