Legal Opinion

Cardinale v. Cardinale

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 9, 2006No. 2004-58-AppealPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG,

for the Court.

The plaintiff, Joanne T. (DiCarlo) Cardinal (Joanne), and the defendant, Norman A. Cardinale (Norman), are no strangers to the Rhode Island Supreme Court. During the last four years, the Cardinales repeatedly have come before us seeking emergency relief and filing petitions for writs of certiorari in connection with their bitterly contested, procedurally defective, bifurcated divorce proceeding. During that time, this Court has issued no fewer than thirty-five separate orders and granted six writs of certiorari. Indeed, if we administered a frequent flyer…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tanner v. Town Council of Town of East GreenwichSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  2. DiBattista v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  3. Cavanagh v. CavanaghSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  4. Estate of Cheetham v. CheethamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  5. Lembo v. LemboSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Paul v. PaulSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  2. Palin v. PalinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  3. Ruffel v. RuffelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  4. McDonough v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  5. Horton v. HortonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API