Legal Opinion

DiBattista v. State

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 8, 2002No. 2001-100-AppealPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLANDERS, Justice.

Relying primarily on claim-preclusion principles, the Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, the State of Rhode Island and various officials of the Department of Children, Youth and Families (DCYF). In doing so, it dismissed the claims of two former foster-care parents, the plaintiffs Vincent and Robin DiBattista (plaintiffs or DiBattistas). Previously, they had challenged DCYF’s revocation of their foster-care license, but the Family Court rejected their administrative appeal and dismissed their claims. Thereafter, the plaintiffs filed a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Rotelli v. CatanzaroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. Swerdlick v. KochSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  4. Marr Scaffolding Co., Inc. v. Fairground Forms, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. Donna Reilly v. United StatesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Plunkett v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  2. Lucier v. Impact Recreation, Ltd.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  3. Alves v. Hometown Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  4. Willis v. OmarSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. Credit Union Central Falls v. GroffSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API