Legal Opinion

Goddard v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 25, 2001No. 90-05-03204; CA A106027PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPSCOMB, J., pro tempore.

This is an action for damages against Farmers Insurance Company (Farmers) resulting from an excess judgment against its insured in a wrongful death case. Plaintiff is the assignee of the claims of the original tortfeasor, Munson, who was Farmers’ insured. Plaintiff appeals the allowance of summary judgment in favor of Farmers by the Multnomah County Circuit Court. We reverse and remand..

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Although at this stage of the proceeding plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of the doubt with respect to any factual issues, the facts are…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Samson v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Centennial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Radcliffe v. Franklin National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Eastham v. Oregon Automobile Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Reesman v. HighfillOregon Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alexander Manufacturing, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership & Trust v. Illinois Union InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  2. Alexander Manufacturing, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
  3. Goddard v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Goddard v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API