Legal Opinion

Eastham v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1975PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff brought an action against one, Byrd, for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident and secured a judgment against Byrd in the sum of $50,000. Byrd had liability coverage in the maximum sum of $25,000 which was furnished by the defendant, Oregon Automobile Insurance Company (the company). The company expended the policy maxi*602mum in partial satisfaction of the judgment. Byrd assigned to plaintiff any claim that he might have against the company for bad faith in failing to settle or failing to attempt to settle plaintiff’s claim against Byrd within Byrd’s policy limits.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Radcliffe v. Franklin National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Rector v. HustedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Eastham v. Oregon Automobile Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. American Physicians Insurance Exchange v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. Gonzalez-ValenzuelaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Centennial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API