O'Donnell v. Big Yank, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge.
Following a ruling on two Motions in Li-mine which precluded a finding of liability against Appellees, the trial court entered an order of Summary Judgment in their favor and against Appellants. The conclusion that an award of Summary Judgment was warranted came after the court ruled that the “spoliation” doctrine applied in this matter and that Appellants’ claims were pre-empted by federal legislation. Because we have determined that both these conclusions were reached in error, we reverse the award of Summary Judgment and remand this matter for trial.
Appellants, Mr. and Mrs.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Roselli v. General Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- DeWeese v. Anchor Hocking Consumer and Industrial Products GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Lee v. Boyle-Midway Household Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Creazzo v. Medtronic, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Long v. YinglingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Dansak v. Cameron Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Payton v. Pennsylvania Sling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Romah v. Hygienic Sanitation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.