Legal Opinion

Lee v. Boyle-Midway Household Products, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-842PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEWIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Louis Lee brings the above-captioned case to recover for -injuries he sustained when drain cleaner he had used to unclog his kitchen sink erupted while he was bent over the sink. Although plaintiff at one time asserted claims against both the defendants and the third-party defendants, he has settled with the third-party defendants, which will be referred to collectively as “Zep” in this opinion. 1

Plaintiff asserts three substantive claims — strict products liability, breach of warranty and negligence — against defendants Boyle-Midway Household…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Tigg Corporation v. Dow Corning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. Roselli v. General Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Baliotis v. McNeilDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. DeWeese v. Anchor Hocking Consumer and Industrial Products GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Beil v. Lakewood Engineering and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. O'Donnell v. Big Yank, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API