Legal Opinion

Pauley v. City of Circleville

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2013No. 2012-1150PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

I. Introduction

{¶ 1} Appellants, Jeremy Pauley and his mother, appeal from a judgment of the Fourth District Court of Appeals that affirmed summary judgment in favor of the city of Circleville regarding appellants’ civil action for injuries Jeremy sustained while sledding in the city’s park. We accepted the appellants’ discretionary appeal, which sets forth a single proposition of law: “Recreational user immunity does not extend to man-made hazards upon real property that do not further or maintain its recreational value.”

{¶ 2} Under the recreational-user statutes (R.C. 1533.18 and 1533.181),…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Light v. Ohio UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. City of Akron v. RowlandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Moss v. Dept. of Natural ResourcesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Marrek v. Cleveland Metroparks Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Combs v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Div. of Parks & Recreation (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Forman v. KrepsOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Jacobs v. OakwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Gilbert v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Stone v. Northmont City SchoolsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API