Legal Opinion

Combs v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Div. of Parks & Recreation (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2016No. 2014-1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} The Ohio Department of Natural Resources (“ODNR”) appeals from a judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals that reversed a grant of summary judgment in its favor in connection with an action filed by Richard Combs for injuries sustained when an ODNR boom mower threw a rock that struck him in the eye.

{¶ 2} R.C. 1533.181, the recreational user statute, provides that no landowner owes any duty to a recreational user to keep the premises safe for entry or use or extends any assurance in that regard. Thus, a landowner is not liable to a recreational user for injuries caused by the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Base Ball Club Co. v. EnoOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Klein v. United StatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Carrel v. Allied Products Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Englehardt v. PhilippsOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Vaccariello v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wright v. WilliamsportOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Gibbs v. Mark Porter Autoplex, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Wise v. E. Hall Funeral Home, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Gilbert v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Stone v. Northmont City SchoolsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API