United States v. Modesto Diaz
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Modesto- Diaz appeals his conviction for possession, with intent to distribute, of one hundred pounds of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), arguing that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. He contends that an indication of the presence of marijuana by an allegedly improperly trained police dog did not constitute probable cause to search his vehicle. For the reasons discussed herein, we hold that the police properly may rely on a trained and certified dog as probable cause for a search. We therefore affirm the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Charles v. LeakeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. L.E. Cooke Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Jennifer Mannino, a Minor, by and Through Her Next Friend and Parent and Natural Guardian, Richard Mannino v. International Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- United States v. John Jay Hill and Malcolm Scott HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- State v. CarlsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Heriberto Navarro-Camacho v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Joseph J. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Michael A. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.