Legal Opinion

United States v. Modesto Diaz

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1994No. 93-1665PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Modesto- Diaz appeals his conviction for possession, with intent to distribute, of one hundred pounds of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), arguing that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. He contends that an indication of the presence of marijuana by an allegedly improperly trained police dog did not constitute probable cause to search his vehicle. For the reasons discussed herein, we hold that the police properly may rely on a trained and certified dog as probable cause for a search. We therefore affirm the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. Charles v. LeakeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. L.E. Cooke Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. Jennifer Mannino, a Minor, by and Through Her Next Friend and Parent and Natural Guardian, Richard Mannino v. International Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. United States v. John Jay Hill and Malcolm Scott HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. State v. CarlsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Heriberto Navarro-Camacho v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Joseph J. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Michael A. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API