State ex rel. Bradford v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original Proceedings in Quo Warranto. Two actions brought in this court on January 17,1888, by The State, on the relation of the attorney general, to determine whether the county of Wallace is organized, or not. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
JOHNSTON, J.:
These are two actions in the nature of quo warranto, originally brought in this court, and which were submitted upon the same testimony and argument, and will *324be disposed of together. The first was brought in the name of the state of Kansas, upon the relation of the attorney general, against Thomas D. Hamilton, who assumed to be county attorney of Wallace county, questioning his authority to exercise and perform the functions and duties of that office; and the second was brought upon the same relation against James Yoxall and several other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Division of Howard CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Duncombe v. PrindleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- State ex rel. Bradford v. OsbornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Miller v. Common School District No. 87Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Aikman v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- McDonald V. DoustIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Kellogg v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889