State ex rel. Bradford v. Osborn
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original Proceedings in Quo Warranto. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This is an action in the nature of quo xoaxranto, brought originally in this court March 18,1887, by the attorney general, to inquire by what authority the Hon. Stephen J. Osborn, judge of the 23d judicial district, assumes to hold a term of the district court in and for Wallace county, Kansas, and to exercise other powers which cannot be exercised except upon the theory that a lawful term of the district court can be held in that county, when in fact and in law, it is alleged, no such term of court can legally be held in that county.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lake Merced Water Co. v. CowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Banks v. BurnamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- National Bank v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
- Baker v. MygattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamblin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Champion Machine Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- State ex rel. Bradford v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888