Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bradford v. Osborn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original Proceedings in Quo Warranto. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This is an action in the nature of quo xoaxranto, brought originally in this court March 18,1887, by the attorney general, to inquire by what authority the Hon. Stephen J. Osborn, judge of the 23d judicial district, assumes to hold a term of the district court in and for Wallace county, Kansas, and to exercise other powers which cannot be exercised except upon the theory that a lawful term of the district court can be held in that county, when in fact and in law, it is alleged, no such term of court can legally be held in that county.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lake Merced Water Co. v. CowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Banks v. BurnamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. National Bank v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
  4. Baker v. MygattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamblin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Champion Machine Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. State ex rel. Bradford v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API