Legal Opinion

Nyman v. City of Eugene

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1979No. 76-4147, CA 7743, SC 25808PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

The primary issue here is the effect to be given to a recitation in a county court record that certain property owners agreed to the widening of a county road. The Court of Appeals, sitting in banc, held that the recitation was insufficient to confer jursidiction on the county court "without an affirmative showing in the record that all of such owners signed the agreement.” 32 Or App 307, 315, 574 P2d 332 (1978). We granted review, 283 Or 235 (1978). 1

The parties submitted this controversy without suit or action pursuant to ORS chapter 27. 2 The facts were stipulated as follows.

Plaintiff is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Hicklin v. McClearOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Wood v. HoneymanOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Thompson v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Willamette Real Estate Co. v. HendrixOregon Supreme Court · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State ex rel. A.A.A. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. West Linn Corporate Park, L.L.C. v. City of West LinnOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Hilterbrand v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Warren v. JoeckelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API