Dunne v. Altschul
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and an order denying a new trial, in the Twenty-third District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Thornton, J.
1Opinion of the Court
McKee, J.:
This appeal is from the judgment and the order denying motion for a new trial, in an action to recover a street assessment in San Francisco, for work ordered by the Board of Supervisors, in constructing a brick sewer, with manhole and cover, in crossing of Broderick and Geary streets, with cesspools, culverts, curbs, and sidewalks on angular corners thereof.
It is contended that the work was required to be done of patented materials, and that the Court below erred in not finding as a fact, from the evidence in the case, that work of that character was required. '
As appears from the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nicolson Pavement Co. v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by4 opinions
- Warren Brothers Co. v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Vale v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Braun, Bryant & Austin v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Sarver v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909