Legal Opinion

Pursglove v. Monongahela Ry.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1925No. Appeal, 135PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Pursglove was employed by the defendant company as a yard brakeman, and aided in moving cars from one track to another to make up new trains, or to combine with others for further transportation. On April 25, 1922, when the accident complained of occurred, plaintiff stood on the front of an engine, traveling at a slow rate toward a switch, intending to pass over it, and transfer certain cars which had just arrived from West Virginia. Admittedly, the employee was then engaged in interstate commerce, a claim advanced by the railroad company to defeat an award by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Boldt v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Davis v. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gaskill v. MelellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Miller v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Central R. R. of New Jersey v. BreischCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API