Miller v. Reading Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Sadler,
The plaintiff, Miller, was injured as a result of a defect in a car coupler while working for the Reading Company, defendant. Admittedly, the railroad was engaged generally in interstate business, but, at the time of the accident, Miller was employed as a brakeman in the Port Richmond yard about a train undertaking intrastate movements. He brought an action to recover for injuries sustained, averring both a violation of the Federal Employers’ Liability and the Safety Appliance Acts. The evidence introduced at the trial failed to disclose an employment in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tipton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Persing v. Citizens Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Breisch v. Central R. Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Tipton v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Central R. R. of New Jersey v. BreischCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.