Legal Opinion

Miller v. Reading Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1927No. Appeal, 270PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The plaintiff, Miller, was injured as a result of a defect in a car coupler while working for the Reading Company, defendant. Admittedly, the railroad was engaged generally in interstate business, but, at the time of the accident, Miller was employed as a brakeman in the Port Richmond yard about a train undertaking intrastate movements. He brought an action to recover for injuries sustained, averring both a violation of the Federal Employers’ Liability and the Safety Appliance Acts. The evidence introduced at the trial failed to disclose an employment in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tipton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Persing v. Citizens Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Breisch v. Central R. Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Tipton v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Central R. R. of New Jersey v. BreischCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API