Legal Opinion

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,856 Peter R. Briney v. Sears, Roebuck & Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1986No. 84-3874PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTIE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Peter and Carolyn Briney, in this products liability action, appeal from the district court’s order granting defendants' motions for directed verdict on two design defect claims and from the jury’s adverse judgment on the remaining failure to warn and instruct claim, asserting various flaws in the jury instructions. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse in part and affirm in part.

I

In 1977 Peter Briney purchased a Sears Craftsman 10-inch electric table saw which was manufactured by Emerson Electric Company (Emerson) and marketed by Sears, Roebuck &…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. George BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Y & O PRESS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. Anderson v. CeccardiOhio Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gina Glazer v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Anthony E. Jiminez v. Mary Washington College Philip Hall, Anthony E. Jiminez v. Mary Washington College Philip HallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  3. Colter v. Barber-Greene Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Mildred A. Johnson, Cross-Appellant v. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. Joseph R. Graham v. American Cyanamid Company, Roy Lee Lundy v. American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API