Legal Opinion
Day v. Krystal Co.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 15, 2007No. 1:05-CV-300PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
COLLIER, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Kristen Madison Day’s (“Plaintiff’) motion to set aside the judgment entered in favor of Defendant Krystal Company (“Defendant”) on January 24, 2007 (Court File No. 48). Plaintiff filed a memorandum in support of her motion, arguing the Court’s final judgment should be set aside because she accepted Defendant’s offer of judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 68 (“Rule 68”) on the same day the Court entered summary judgment in favor of Defendant (Court File No. 49). Defendant filed a response to Plaintiffs motion arguing…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edward H. Bohlin Co., Inc. v. Banning Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Intera Corporation v. George Henderson IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Colonial Penn Insurance Company v. Willard Frank Coil Betty Marian CoilCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kroener v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- In Re StuartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Jesus Lazaro Collar v. Abalux, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Ortiz-Moss v. New York City Department of TransportationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Smith v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.