Legal Opinion

Smith v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 2009No. Civil Action No. 08-2927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BARTLE, Chief Judge.

Before the court is the motion of defendant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”) to vacate and strike a judgment entered by the Clerk of Court pursuant to Rule 68(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff Ingrid Smith sued SEPTA for violations of the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654. On April 2, 2009, SEPTA moved for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On May 1, 2009, while the motion was pending, it made an offer of judgment to plaintiff in accordance with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Colonial Penn Insurance Company v. Willard Frank Coil Betty Marian CoilCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  2. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. James Perkins v. U S West CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  4. Day v. Krystal Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kroener v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Jesus Lazaro Collar v. Abalux, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Coleman v. Wilson & Associates, P.L.L.C.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
  4. Skender v. Eden Isle CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API