Legal Opinion

People v. A.M.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 2013No. A136288PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RIVERA, J.

After being declared a ward of the court as a truant pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 601, A.M. (Minor) was placed on global positioning system (GPS) monitoring as a condition of probation. Minor later objected to being placed on GPS monitoring, and the juvenile court issued an order ruling that it was appropriate for section 601 wards. In her appeal from this order, Minor contends GPS monitoring as a condition of probation for a truant is not authorized by statute and is unconstitutional. We shall affirm the order.

I. BACKGROUND

The Alameda County District…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michael G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. Ronnie P.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. R.V.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. Walter P.California Court of Appeal · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Alejandro R. (In re Alejandro R.), California Court of Appeal, 1st District2015
  2. In re Gabriela M. CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API