Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Schrag

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1931No. 29,998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This action was upon a-note given by the defendant'to the plaintiff bank. The answer was want of consideration and obtaining the note by means of misrepresentations and fraud on the part of an officer of the plaintiff bank by which the bank received and retained a benefit. A jury was waived, the case was tried to the court, and judgment was rendered for defendant. During the trial of the cause the plaintiff bank failed and the cause was revived in thé name of the receiver, who appeals from the adverse judgment.

The defendant gave his note…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shriver v. Union Stock Yards National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Abmeyer v. German-American State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Cincinnati Discount Co. v. AsherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Farmers State Bank v. BrennekeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. First National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kershaw v. JulienCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Lutz v. Peoples State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Claude Neon Federal Co. v. MajorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API