Legal Opinion
Connecticut National Bank v. Zuckerman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 24, 1992No. 10906PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendants Robert Zuckerman and Kim Zuckerman1 appeal from the denial of their motion to open a judgment of strict foreclosure filed pursuant to General Statutes § 49-15.2 The basis on which these defendants sought to open the judgment was that the property being foreclosed was residential and that they were thus entitled to invoke the protection afforded to them pursuant to General Statutes §§ 49-31d through 49-31i.
The facts necessary to a resolution of this appeal may be summarized as follows. On January 15, 1988, the defendants executed a promissory note payable to the plaintiff in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Timm v. TimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. SurabianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Connecticut National Bank v. N. E. Owen II, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Small v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Connecticut National Bank v. ZuckermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. ConantConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. FritzellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- First Union National Bank v. BonitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.