Legal Opinion
Connecticut National Bank v. Zuckerman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 23, 1993No. 12086PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The plaintiff in this foreclosure appeal has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal was filed solely for purposes of delay. Because we agree with the plaintiff that the filing of the appeal was nothing more than a dilatory tactic, the motion to dismiss is granted.
*441This matter was previously before this court on an appeal from the denial of a motion to open a judgment of strict foreclosure. Connecticut National Bank v. Zuckerman, 29 Conn. App. 541, 616 A.2d 814 (1992). The defendants1 did not appeal from the judgment of strict foreclosure, made no prior motion for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. AvcollieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Texaco, Inc. v. GolartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Wendland v. Ridgefield Construction Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Nowell v. NowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Town of Wilton v. McGovernConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. HairstonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v. GIANOPOULOSConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- U.S. Bank National Assn. v. RagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Norwich Savings Society v. Caldrello, No. 512204 (Apr. 26, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.