Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Dolcater
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 17, 2003PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 6, 2002, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.
At the time claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits in December 2001, she was president and sole owner of a subchapter S corporation. She testified that she continued to receive mail for the corporation at her home although the corporation had been inactive for several months and the checking account had been closed in May 2001. Claimant was *584in the process of dissolving the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of SichelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of BundschuhAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of GormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Claim of KoenesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of BigelowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of SalomoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of BattagliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of CassaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.